引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   View/Add Comment  Download reader   Close
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1233次   下载 803 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
中国海岛型旅游目的地生态安全综合评价与障碍因素研究
李梦程1,2, 李世泰2, 王成新1, 秦伟山2,3, 孙剑锋2
1.山东师范大学 地理与环境学院, 山东 济南 250358;2.鲁东大学 资源与环境工程学院, 山东 烟台 264025;3.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101
摘要:
从可持续发展的视角,基于驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应的DPSIR模型构建了海岛型旅游目的地生态安全评价体系,选取中国12个县级地域单元的海岛作为研究区,通过TOPSIS模型对其2018年的生态安全水平进行测度,并根据其贴近度指数划分为不安全、较不安全、比较安全、安全4个等级,引用障碍度模型对影响海岛型旅游目的地生态安全的障碍因素进行诊断分析。结果表明:(1)洞头区、崇明区、定海区的生态安全等级为不安全;平潭县、嵊泗县、普陀区、玉环市和南澳县为较不安全;长岛县和岱山县为较安全;长海县和东山县为安全状态,研究区内海岛型旅游目的地的生态安全面临着较大威胁。(2)压力系统中海岛脆弱性和响应系统中生态保护力度是生态安全水平提升的主要障碍因素,而自然灾害对海岛的损害、环保资金支持力度不足以及有限的海岛空间承载量又是其中最关键的因素。基于障碍因素的诊断,提出了生态安全水平提升的策略,为保障我国海岛的生态安全提供实证参考。
关键词:  海岛型旅游目的地  生态安全  DPSIR模型  综合评价  障碍因素
DOI:10.11759/hykx20190819002
分类号:X826
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41501129,41371170);山东省软科学研究计划项目(2017RKB01079)
Research on comprehensive evaluation and obstacles of ecological security of island-type tourism destination in China
LI Meng-cheng1,2, LI Shi-tai2, WANG Cheng-xin1, QIN Wei-shan2,3, SUN Jian-feng2
1.College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China;2.School of Resource and Environment Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China;3.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Abstract:
From the perspective of sustainable development, based on the DPSIR model of driving force, pressure, state, impact and response, an ecological security evaluation system of island tourism destination was constructed. The island of 12 county-level regional units in China were selected as the research area, and its ecological security level in 2018 was measured by TOPSIS model.According to the proximity index, it was divided into four levels:unsafe, less safe, comparatively safe and safe.Meanwhile, the obstacle degree model was used to diagnose and analyze the obstacle factors affecting the ecological security of island tourism destination. The results show that:(1)The ecological security level of Dongtou District, Chongming district and Dinghai District was unsafe. Pingtan County, Shengsi County, Putuo District, Yuhuan City and Nan'ao County were less safe. Changdao County and Daishan County were relatively safe.Changhai County and Dongshan County were safe.The ecological security of island tourism destinations in the study area is facing a greater threat. (2)The natural vulnerability of islands in the pressure system and the ecological protection in response systems were the main obstacles to the improvement of ecological security level, while the damage caused by marine natural disasters to island tourist destinations, insufficient support for environmental protection funds, and limited island space carrying capacity were the most critical factor. Based on the above diagnosis of obstacle factors, this paper puts forward the strategies of improving the level of ecological security, which provides empirical reference for protecting the ecological security of islands in China.
Key words:  island-type tourism destination  ecological security  DPSIR model  comprehensive evaluation  obstacle factors
Copyright ©  Editorial Office for Marine Sciences Copyright©2008 All Rights Reserved
Supervised by: Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)   Sponsored by: Institute of Oceanology, CAS
Address: 7 Nanhai Road, Qingdao, China.  Postcode: 266071  Tel: 0532-82898755  E-mail: bjb@qdio.ac.cn
Technical support: Beijing E-Tiller Co.,Ltd.