首页 | 期刊介绍 | 编委会 | 道德声明 | 投稿指南 | 常用下载 | 过刊浏览 | In English
引用本文:张振波,赵俊峰,付永涛,刘 宾,周章国,施小斌,薛志刚.GT-1M 海洋重力仪与KSS31M 海洋重力仪的对比[J].海洋科学,2015,39(5):85-91.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器  关闭
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1490次   下载 2759 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
GT-1M 海洋重力仪与KSS31M 海洋重力仪的对比
张振波1, 赵俊峰2, 付永涛3, 刘 宾1, 周章国3, 施小斌2, 薛志刚1
1.中海石油(中国)有限公司深圳分公司;2.中国科学院南海海洋研究所;3.中国科学院海洋研究所
摘要:
为了检验俄罗斯、加拿大合作生产的GT-1M 海洋重力仪与德国KSS31M 海洋重力仪的工作性能, 验证GT-1M 重力数据的可靠性, 将GT-1M 采集的3 条重力剖面与KSS31M 重力仪采集的重力测网进行了对比分析。结果显示: GT01 剖面与26 条KSS31M 重力测线的交点差均值为0.31 mGal, 交点差均方根为2.51 mGal; GT02 剖面与11 条KSS31M 重力测线的, 交点差均值为–0.78 mGal, 交点差均方根为1.97 mGal; 全部交点差均值为–0.01 mGal, 均方根(RMS)为2.32 mGal。GT01 剖面与KSS31M测网网格化切割的剖面的变化趋势一致, 重力变化幅值基本吻合, 相关系数为0.98; 而GT02 剖面位于KSS31 测网边缘, 网格化切割的KSS 重力剖面不能反应真实的重力场, 虽然GT02 剖面变化趋势一致,但相关系数仅为0.94, 在相位上也明显有误差。考虑到测网位于海底地形崎岖的深水区, 而且两次测量时间间隔达3 a, 因此GT-1M 重力仪测试的结果还是基本与KSS31M 重力仪吻合的, 数据是可靠的。该分析结果对今后的重力测量工作有参考价值。
关键词:  GT-1M 海洋重力仪  KSS31M 海洋重力仪  海洋重力测量
DOI:10.11759/hykx20130301001
分类号:
基金项目:中国科学院战略性先导科技专项海洋重磁场特征(XDA1103010102)
The comparison between GT-1M and KSS 31M marine gravitymeters
Abstract:
Three gravity profile data acquired by GT-1M marine gravitymeter produced in Russia and Canada and by KSS31M marine gravitymeter produced in Germany were compared. The mean value of intersection difference between GT01 profile and 26 KSS31M gravity survey lines was 0.31 mGal. The RMS of intersection difference was 2.51 mGal. The mean value of intersection difference between GT02 profile and eleven KSS31M gravity survey lines was –0.78 mGal. The RMS of intersection difference was 1.97 mGal. The mean value of all intersection difMarine Sciences / Vol. 39, No.5 / 2015 91 ference was –0.01 mGal and the RMS was 2.32 mGal. The GT01 profile had the same variation trend with the profile sliced from the gridded survey network of KSS31M. The variation of gravity amplitude was basically consistent, and the correlation coefficient was 0.98. The GT02 profile was at the edge of the survey network of KSS31M, so the sliced profile from the gridded measuring network of KSS31 could not reflect the real gravity field. Although they had the consistent trend, the correlation coefficient was 0.94, and they had obvious error in phase. In consideration that the measuring network was located in the deep sea with rugged terrain and the measurement intervals were up to 3 years, the test result of GT gravimeter was basically consistent with that of the KSS31M gravimeter and the data are reliable.
Key words:  GT-1M marine gravitymeter  KSS31M marine gravitymeter  marine gravity survey
版权所有 《海洋科学》 Copyright©2008 All Rights Reserved
主管单位:中国科学院 主办单位:中国科学院海洋研究所
地址:青岛市市南区福山路32号  邮编:266071  电话:0532-82898755  E-mail:marinesciences@qdio.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司